Seven directions of research · All goals
Researcher
Jocelyne Bloch
Confirmed by a primary source
The work, and the role in it
Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain-spine interface.
Walking
- conceived and supervised the study — the article, at the publisher · named there as J.B. · checked 2026-09-24
H.L., G.Charvet, J.B. and G.Courtine conceived and supervised the study.
- performed the neurosurgical interventions — the article, at the publisher · named there as J.B. · checked 2026-09-24
S.Chabardes and J.B. performed neurosurgical interventions.
- principal investigator of the registered trial — the ClinicalTrials.gov record · named there as Jocelyne Bloch · checked 2026-09-24
{"name":"Jocelyne Bloch","affiliation":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois","role":"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR"}
Technology: Epidural spinal cord stimulation
Honest stage: First results in a few people — early evidence, not proof that it works
The scientific original: PubMed record · Article at the publisher
Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis.
Walking
- conceived and supervised the study — the article, at the publisher · named there as J. Bloch · checked 2026-09-24
G.C. and J. Bloch conceived and supervised the study.
- performed the neurosurgical interventions — the article, at the publisher · named there as J. Bloch · checked 2026-09-24
J. Bloch performed neurosurgical interventions.
- sponsor-investigator of the registered trial — the ClinicalTrials.gov record · named there as Jocelyne Bloch · checked 2026-09-24
"responsibleParty":{"type":"SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR","investigatorFullName":"Jocelyne Bloch"
Technology: Epidural spinal cord stimulation
Honest stage: First results in a few people — early evidence, not proof that it works
The scientific original: PubMed record · Article at the publisher · Trial record at ClinicalTrials.gov
Follow the technology of this work
Epidural spinal cord stimulation
Following adds the technology to your list on this device; it appears under “What changed for me”. It follows the science, not the person.
This shows who did the research. It is not a recommendation of a treatment, a doctor, a laboratory or a clinic.
No contact details of anyone are held. The way to them is the official page or the original, linked above.