A subject this map covers
Brain–spine interface
Part of: Interfaces and neuroprostheses
What belongs here
A system reading intention in cortex and driving spinal stimulation, closing a bypass around the injury.
What does not belong here, however close it looks
An interface and a stimulator that are not joined into one loop belong to their own concepts.
What has been looked at
Counted from what the sources catalogue, not from reading the work. It says how much exists and over what span of years — never what any of it found.
- Registered or indexed as work in people: 9 records · 2023–2026
- Indexed as work in animals: 2 records · 2016–2018
- The source has not said who or what was studied: 51 records · 1984–2026
Checked
Records a person has read against the original and published into this map. These carry measurements, evidence states and a place on the ladder.
- Deep Brain Stimulation and Brain–Spine Interface for Functional Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury
- A brain–spine interface that links cortical signals to epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord restores standing and walking ability after spinal cord injury.
- A fully implanted brain–spine interface maintains reliable calibration and performance over long-term independent use after spinal cord injury.
- Brain-spine interface for movement restoration after spinal cord injury
- Brain-Spine Interface Restores Standing, Walking, and Stair-Climbing After Spinal Cord Injury
- Neurorehabilitation supported by a brain–spine interface improves neurological recovery after spinal cord injury, including walking ability when the stimulation is switched off.
- The Application of Brain-Spine Interface on Spinal Cord Injury
- Users of a brain–spine interface report natural volitional control over leg movements after spinal cord injury.
- Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain-spine interface.
Found in the scientific sources, not yet checked
Titles and identifiers as the sources publish them. Nobody here has read these papers, and nothing on this shelf is a result, a recommendation or evidence that anything works. Each line opens the original.
62 records
This grouping is the source's own cataloguing, not a reading of the paper. It says where a record was filed, not what it found.
The source has not said who or what was studied
- Progressive Cystic Degeneration of the Spinal Cord Following Spinal Cord Injury — Crossref · 1984 · journal-article
- Neuroinflammation: Brain and Spinal Cord Injury — Crossref · reference-entry
Where this was looked for, and when
The exact question each source was asked, the day it was asked, and what came back. A zero on this page is only honest if these are on it.
| ClinicalTrials.gov | asked, and it has nothing | asked on 2026-09-29 | the source found 0 · this programme has 3 · still to fetch 0 | aim: every record matching this question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crossref | asked, and it answered | asked on 2026-09-16 | the source found 3694508 · this programme has 48 | aim: a sample of the most relevant records. This source ranks a bag of words, so its own total is the size of the corpus that shares some of them, never a set still owed. |
| PubMed | asked, and it has nothing | asked on 2026-10-05 | the source found 0 · this programme has 13 · still to fetch 0 | aim: every record matching this question |
The question asked
- ClinicalTrials.gov
("brain spine interface" OR "digital bridge") - Crossref
spinal cord injury brain spine interface digital bridge - PubMed
("Spinal Cord Injuries"[MeSH Terms] OR "spinal cord injury"[Title/Abstract] OR "spinal cord injuries"[Title/Abstract] OR "spinal cord trauma"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("brain spine interface"[Title/Abstract] OR "digital bridge"[Title/Abstract])