SCI Regeneration MapWhat the world knows about repairing the injured spinal cord

Seven directions of research

A subject this map covers

Robotic upper-limb therapy

A list of codes kept in this browser. No name, no medical answer and no account — nothing personal is stored and nothing is registered.

Part of: Rehabilitation

What belongs here

Robotic and mechanised systems for training the arm and hand after tetraplegia.

What does not belong here, however close it looks

Tendon or nerve transfer surgery is an operation, not rehabilitation.

What has been looked at

Counted from what the sources catalogue, not from reading the work. It says how much exists and over what span of years — never what any of it found.

  • Registered or indexed as work in people: 2143 records · 1962–2026
  • Indexed as work in animals: 116 records · 1974–2026
  • Indexed as laboratory work: 2 records · 2003–2020
  • The source has not said who or what was studied: 55 records · 1953–2025
  • This collected shelf has no clinical-trial registry records for this subject. Check the source query and collection status below before drawing conclusions.
  • No matching published catalogue records are linked above. Human-review status must be checked on the evidence itself.

Published in this map

Catalogue records matching this subject. Publication here does not establish human review, measured results or effectiveness. Open a record to inspect its sources and evidence.

No published catalogue records match this subject yet.

This is a result within this map, not a claim that no research exists. The source records below can help you continue searching.

Found in the scientific sources, not yet checked

Titles and identifiers as the sources publish them. Nobody here has read these papers, and nothing on this shelf is a result, a recommendation or evidence that anything works. Each line opens the original.

2316 records

This grouping is the source's own cataloguing, not a reading of the paper. It says where a record was filed, not what it found.

The source has not said who or what was studied

Where this was looked for, and when

The latest collection walk and the accumulated shelf have different scopes. A zero applies only to that source query and its date window; older records may remain on the shelf. It does not mean no research exists.

ClinicalTrials.govlatest collection walk returned no recordsasked on 2026-10-05
Collection window: 2026-09-16 – 2026-10-05
matched in this collection walk 0 · accumulated records across collection walks 0 · still to fetch in this walk 0aim: every record matching this question
Crossrefasked, and it answeredasked on 2026-09-16
Collection window: all dates before the end date – 2026-09-16
matched in this collection walk 2115330 · accumulated records across collection walks 50aim: a sample of the most relevant records. This source ranks a bag of words, so its own total is the size of the corpus that shares some of them, never a set still owed.
PubMedasked, and it answeredasked on 2026-10-12
Collection window: all dates before the end date – 2026-10-12
matched in this collection walk 2317 · accumulated records across collection walks 2317 · still to fetch in this walk 0aim: every record matching this question
The question asked
  • ClinicalTrials.gov("robotic upper limb" OR "hand rehabilitation robot")
  • Crossrefspinal cord injury robotic upper limb hand rehabilitation robot
  • PubMed("Spinal Cord Injuries"[MeSH Terms] OR "spinal cord injury"[Title/Abstract] OR "spinal cord injuries"[Title/Abstract] OR "spinal cord trauma"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("Robotics"[MeSH Terms] OR "Upper Extremity"[MeSH Terms] OR "robotic upper limb"[Title/Abstract] OR "hand rehabilitation robot"[Title/Abstract])

Subjects next to this one