Clinician
Somebody who answers to a person in front of them: what the evidence supports today, in humans, and what it does not.
What this workspace asks
Including the questions this participant is NOT shown, each with the reason it was decided against — a decision that looks like an oversight is an oversight as far as a reader can tell.
What is known
Nothing is recorded
A clinician answers to somebody in front of them; the state of the evidence is the answer, in the same numbers as everyone else sees.
Where the evidence disagrees
Nothing is recorded
Where the evidence disagrees, saying so is the clinical answer.
Where it is being tried
Nothing is recorded
A trial a person could ask about is the most actionable fact here.
What is missing
Nothing is recorded
What is not known is half of what a clinician has to say.
What changed
Nothing is recorded
What moved since the last consultation.
Who works on it
This role is not shown this
Named individuals are not a clinical input, and a workspace that lists them beside a treatment question implies a referral this system cannot support.
What this participant may do
Every action stands on a permission that already exists. A workspace never offers what the database would refuse.
- Propose a record — Propose a record read in practice, for a curator to decide.
- Read the evidence chain — Read the chain behind a number.
Who to take it to
Hand-offs written down in advance: from whom, on which question, and why that participant rather than another.
- Where the evidence disagrees → Canon curator — A contradiction that matters clinically is a decision the canon owes an answer to, and the curator is who decides.
- What is missing → Researcher — A gap a clinician meets in practice is a study somebody should run.