Canon curator

What this workspace asks

Including the questions this participant is NOT shown, each with the reason it was decided against — a decision that looks like an oversight is an oversight as far as a reader can tell.

• Where the evidence disagrees

  Nothing is recorded

  A curator's work begins where the evidence disagrees with itself.

• What is missing

  Nothing is recorded

  A gap says which record to look for next.

• What is known

  Nothing is recorded

  The state a decision would move.

• What changed

  Nothing is recorded

  What the last recompute did.

• Where it is being tried

  Nothing is recorded

  The trials behind the studies being decided.

• Who works on it

  Nothing is recorded

  The groups whose work is being read.

What this participant may do

Every action stands on a permission that already exists. A workspace never offers what the database would refuse.

• Decide a record — Decide what the canon says: publish, refuse, or ask for evidence.
• Read the evidence chain — Read the chain behind a number.

This role is shown what the system is checking right now. That desk opens only for a named curator who is signed in, so there is no way through to it from here.

Who to take it to

Hand-offs written down in advance: from whom, on which question, and why that participant rather than another.

• What is missing → Researcher — A gap the canon cannot close by curation is a gap that needs a study.