Laboratory
A group rather than a person: what the group's own work stands on, and who else is working on the same technologies.
What this workspace asks
Including the questions this participant is NOT shown, each with the reason it was decided against — a decision that looks like an oversight is an oversight as far as a reader can tell.
Who works on it
Nothing is recorded
A group's first question is who else is on the same technologies.
What is known
Nothing is recorded
What the field's evidence stands at.
Where it is being tried
Nothing is recorded
Which trials are running on it.
What is missing
Nothing is recorded
Where an experiment would add most.
Where the evidence disagrees
Nothing is recorded
What the group would be replicating into.
What changed
Nothing is recorded
What moved since the last look.
What this participant may do
Every action stands on a permission that already exists. A workspace never offers what the database would refuse.
- Propose a record — Propose the group's own work into the queue.
- Read the evidence chain — Read the chain behind a number.
This role is shown what the system is checking right now. That desk opens only for a named curator who is signed in, so there is no way through to it from here.
Who to take it to
Hand-offs written down in advance: from whom, on which question, and why that participant rather than another.
- What is missing → Organisation — A gap worth closing needs somebody to fund the closing of it.