Organisation
A funder, a company or an institution: where work is happening, who is doing it, and what has changed since the last look.
What this workspace asks
Including the questions this participant is NOT shown, each with the reason it was decided against — a decision that looks like an oversight is an oversight as far as a reader can tell.
Who works on it
Nothing is recorded
Who is doing the work being funded or run.
Where it is being tried
Nothing is recorded
Where it is being tried.
What changed
Nothing is recorded
What moved since the last report.
What is known
Nothing is recorded
What the evidence stands at.
What is missing
Nothing is recorded
Where money would change something.
Where the evidence disagrees
This role is not shown this
An organisation reading contradictions as a portfolio signal is how a scientific disagreement turns into a funding decision without a scientist in between. It is on the researcher and curator workspaces, which is where somebody can act on it.
What this participant may do
Every action stands on a permission that already exists. A workspace never offers what the database would refuse.
- Read the evidence chain — Read the chain behind a number.
This role is shown what the system is checking right now. That desk opens only for a named curator who is signed in, so there is no way through to it from here.
Who to take it to
Hand-offs written down in advance: from whom, on which question, and why that participant rather than another.
- Who works on it → Laboratory — An organisation reaches the work through the group doing it.