A person with an injury

What this workspace asks

Including the questions this participant is NOT shown, each with the reason it was decided against — a decision that looks like an oversight is an oversight as far as a reader can tell.

• What is known

  Nothing is recorded

  The first question a person asks is what is actually known, and the answer is the same number a researcher sees — with the words changed, not the value.

• Where it is being tried

  Nothing is recorded

  Where something is being tried is a fact about the world, and it is the fact a person is most often looking for.

• Where the evidence disagrees

  Nothing is recorded

  A person is entitled to know that the evidence disagrees with itself. Hiding it would be the one kind of comfort this project refuses.

• Who works on it

  This role is not shown this

  Shown as laboratories and organisations elsewhere in the site. Inside a personal workspace a list of named people reads as an invitation to contact them, which D-07 does not permit this canon to support.

• What is missing

  This role is not shown this

  A map of research gaps is a working tool for somebody planning studies. Presented to a person about their own body it reads as a list of things nobody is doing for them, which is not what it means.

• What changed

  Nothing is recorded

  What changed since the last look is the reason to come back, and it is the same digest everybody else reads.

What this participant may do

Every action stands on a permission that already exists. A workspace never offers what the database would refuse.

• Keep your own record — Keep a personal record — in the private circuit, behind its own consent, and never in this projection.
• Read the evidence chain — Read the evidence chain behind any number shown here.

Your own record is kept in the private circuit, behind its own consent — open it

Who to take it to

Hand-offs written down in advance: from whom, on which question, and why that participant rather than another.

• Where the evidence disagrees → Researcher — A disagreement in the evidence is read by somebody who works on it.
• Where it is being tried → Clinician — Whether a trial is a reasonable thing to ask about is a clinical judgement, and this system does not make it.